🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions regarding the remarks delivered by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz in the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is American – and sports frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown was appropriate. Rather, he invoked the continued absence of American men at the majors: not one of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

Everyone love a storyline, me too. But really. Even if Fritz had beaten the legend for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, who he has yet to beat in an official match. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven major titles (plus Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a tired Djokovic in the subsequent match). He stated in press after the loss that he actually liked his draw, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the three best players in the world in succession. He is well justified to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian quarter-final who else in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world starting this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six matches over No 3 the German with growing comfort. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the future. But evidently that right now, that’s as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. His elite serve and powerful power on each front side and backhand are sufficiently adequate to dispose of most opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the select few generational talents, though, he is often overmatched. The past few seasons has witnessed the curious rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nonetheless move around with the alarming speed and grace of smaller players. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a quite harsh restriction on his upside.

The American has achieved a several dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. 24 months later, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he suddenly exploded up to No 4 – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What could Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the ongoing drought of US male players winning major titles when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the All England Club last four in July.

Fritz’s performance in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four sets, a win that only felt uncertain for moments towards the very end, when the American had survived a couple match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair looked evenly matched during the exchanges, with Fritz creating plenty of chances to break. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after break point, extending the run to the point of agony. When Fritz eventually did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly played a terrible service game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to expend excessive energy to win it. Facing set points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to heaven. He extended the contest twice on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, only a result of having to hit too many second serves.

The contest was quite ironclad proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to defeat any version of the Serbian, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and did not especially seem like he believed he could win. This is perfectly fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he could.

The American is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful presence in media sessions, more so than almost anyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, prepared to not only say how he feels or the tactic he felt decided a contest, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for America failing to spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I don’t do it,” the American informed an interviewer in June of claiming a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying empire is in fact highly unlikely for everybody else. {